| Article #: | 13 |
Dear Charlie,
Recently, I came across an article that spoke briefly of the Kelvin ratings
of some lamps as it related to the overall sensitivity of a camera. I was under
the impression that light was measured in nanometers, not Kelvin degrees. Call
me confused, but I was just starting to feel comfortable with this whole light
to camera relationship when this new buzz word (Kelvin) came into the works.
Help me please. Is it Kelvin or wave length that I need to watch in the field.
Sign me; In the Dark
Dear In the Dark,
First of all, as you suspected, both terms relate directly to light. However
they are two separate measurements of two separate theories.
Nanometers relate to the wave length
of a particular color of light. A light wave travels in a up / down snake like
fashion or as a wave on the ocean, hence the reference light wave. To measure a
light wave, we draw an imaginary line through the middle of a complete wave and
measure the distance from the start to the end. This measurement is very small
and is done in nanometers. A nanometer is one billionth of a meter or 10 -9. If
we look at a chart of the visual light spectrum, the color red would show up as
a light wave that is 700 nanometers or 7 billionths of a meter long. Violet is
400 nanometers long. All other colors in the visible light spectrum are divided
at the fifty nanometer increments. Using a simple acronym "ROY G BIV"
we are able to remember the visible light spectrum; Red, Orange, Yellow, Green,
Blue, Indigo, Violet. Based upon what I said previously, if Violet is 400
nanometers long, Blue would be 500 nanometers.
We use the color of light when
concerned with a camera's response to a particular style or type of lighting.
For example: If we have a parking lot that is lit by yellow sodium vapor
lighting, it is imperative that we use a camera that responds well to the color
yellow. By referring to the camera's spectral response chart, we can calculate
how much video image a camera will produce under yellow light as opposed to
white, red, or green light. Once verified, the only hold on whether or not we
could use the camera in the parking would relate to the camera's overall
sensitivity. Therefore, if the camera's overall sensitivity (ability to see in
lower light) is equivalent or better than the amount of reflected light
provided, at night, this would be an excellent choice for our parking lot.
Kelvin on the other hand refers to
the overall temperature of the light. This came about when a man named Kelvin
discovered that if he heated up an iron bar, each degree of temperature
difference would produce a different affect to the spectrum output of the bar.
That is, once heated up, the bar produced light. However at 300 degrees Kelvin,
the bar produced a very even amount of visible light and an extreme amount of
infrared light. At 250 degrees Kelvin, the bar produced a very even amount of
visible light with a small amount of infrared and a little ultraviolet.
Therefore, this measurement is very important to us when the camera is tested
for sensitivity. If a manufacturer uses a lamp with a Kelvin rating of 300
degrees, the sensitivity rating for his camera might be extreme if the camera is
sensitive to infrared lighting. This is because the sensitivity ratings for
cameras are based upon visible light, not infrared. Therefore, the accepted (but
not enforced) industry standard for testing a camera's sensitivity is done using
a light with a Kelvin rating of 250 degrees.
At the end of the day, the spectral
response of a camera, as measured in nanometers is a field number that will
apply under abnormal or unusual visible or infrared lighting conditions. Kelvin
ratings can be used in the field to determine the amount of visible and/or
infrared light or the actual temperature ratings of lamps as it applies to the
spectral response of a camera, but for the most part is not an everyday serious
consideration.
At any rate, I sincerely hope that I
have not confused the issue for you. Please feel free to fax forward any
additional questions or queries that you may have. I am in your service.